As we read in his essay, after much debate with himself of how the elephant did not intentionally harm anyone he still decides or is pressured into shooting the elephant. He repeatedly uses metaphorical language to develop this connection. While persuasion is most commonly associated with in-your-face advertisements and political speeches, more subtle rhetorical artifacts, such as novels and essays, can contain equally persuasive elements. In the way that the elephant, in the essay, can represent the Burmese society, Orwell's fear of humiliation can represent the motive of the broader British colonial project. Orwell makes himself clear when say that he is unhappy with his job. The elephant symbolises the Burmese whilst Orwell is a symbol of the Empire.
Elephants can lift a car with it's trunk. It can also run over enemies and charge at them. For example, Orwell himself symbolises the weaknesses of the Empire and the elephant symbolises the strengths of Burma. The elephant is chained up but breaks free, and follows its natural behavior. Coringhee: From or having to do with the town of Coringa, India. Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
In this way the elephant is a symbol of oppression because the elephant is forcing the narrator to make a decision about where he has to stand on the issue of shooting in order to maintain a specific outward appearance. The person who was in charge of keeping it had searched for it and was very far from the place. There are two dominant characters in the story; an elephant and its executioner. The story starts when Orwell narrates his background and expresses his understanding of imperialism. The text is told by a first person narrator, who tells us about being a policeman in Burma and about his doubt, whether to kill an animal or not.
This is not some minor pang, or nagging worry. Backed by second thoughts and a crowd of thousands, he finds himself shooting the elephant and reflecting that it was not justified; however, it was a choice pushed by his duty and the people. Burmans were bringing dash and baskets even before I left, and I was told they had stripped his body almost to the bones by the afternoon. Orwell's self-consciousness as the face of British imperialism is central to his internal conflict as he tries to uphold the image of the impenetrable empire while going against his personal inclination, and killing an elephant that he doesn't want to kill. But the crowd behind just would not agree. I was sub-divisional police officer of the town, and in an aimless, petty kind of way anti-European feeling was very bitter.
Another theme in the story is the meeting between two cultures — in where it describes the burmese, that despise the British. Throughout his adventure, he decides that it is best to kill the elephant however he believes that It is against his rationale. Part 3 The significance of this is that the reason he does not turn around and walk away is the same reason he thinks of walking away in the first place. The Britons dominated and oppressed the economy, politics, and social life of Burma and other near conquered lands in 1920s. The setting supports the theme because if the setting had been different, the anecdote would not have had the significance that the author gives it, and even more, it probably would not even have happened. Due to the elephant's size, however, it seems best to shoot the animal in the head for a faster and less painful death. The oppressors continues to break rules and disregards rights in order to stay in power and to show control of the land and people.
The point of the story happens very much in our normal life, in fact everyday. There are people who can handle the pressure from the expectation and there are people who cannot. Persuasion is an inescapable fact of communication. Another parallel to how the narrator can be compared to the elephant is through the pronouns he uses to describe the elephant. Evidence for this lies in his moment of comic irony when he says that if the elephant were to trample him the native would laugh at him- this touch of ridiculousness emphasizes the effect Imperialism has had on Orwell.
He also describes the injustices in. Finally, the Buddhist priest, presented more as a stereotype, is a flat character. Words: 1048 - Pages: 5. Because it is an immoral relationship of power, it compels the oppressor to act immorally to keep up appearances that he is right. This leads to the sense that the narrator feels oppressed by the people as they are controlling, whereas normally he would be controlling the Burmese. The elephant needs to be killed before it oppresses the people even further.
They do not fit in with the natives and is judged because of their nationalities. Our main character, whom I assume is Orwell,. And so, there is constant tension between the occupier and the occupied. Whether it be a poster for a new movie or handling social pressures to conform, persuasion is one of the most prevalent styles of rhetorical dialogue. This quote first of all shows that Orwell actually did not intend the shooting of the elephant.