How are they going to pay for all the necessary expenses if they come from poor families? To work well, strong federal oversight would be needed. While electors are generally extremely loyal to the party they align with, they don't have to vote the way the people of their state instructed them to. Alternative election methods such as , , and even cannot be properly implemented at the Presidential level as long as the Electoral College is in place. Many people support the Electoral College because the Founding Fathers thought it was the only way to have a democracy without completely trusting the people to elect the president. Many people feel that the electoral college is unfair because it seems that even if we vote it only comes down to the electoral college to see if they won presidency or re-election. Each state gets a number of electors equal to its number of members in the U. The electoral system is flawed and should be replaced.
The number of electoral votes per state ranges from 3 to 55, for a total of 538. The Electoral College is a body that elects the President and Vice President of the United States… 961 Words 4 Pages the case of the Electoral College apparently the majority doesn't count. Their campaigns often go undetected by the general public. The one with the highest number of votes became president. For example, if you lived in Georgia during the 2004 election and you voted for Kerry, because Bush won the majority of the state, your vote is given to Bush. As a member of the negative side of this debate, I firmly believe that the Electoral College should not be abolished. This to me is very outrageous because of how our forefathers from the past had fought for our right to vote, it is being put to waste since it only goes by the Electoral College and not our votes.
There have been over 700 proposed constitutional amendments aimed at fixing or abolishing this process. This means that when Americans go to the poll every 4 years to vote for our President, their direct votes is not what determines the outcome. After debating and exhausting all possibilities, the , in its most basic form, was established. States may do this different ways — early voting in some states; same-day registration in others; making Election Day a holiday in still other jurisdictions. The problem would be solved, no amendment needed. It helps provide a more stable political environment and gives certainty and finality to an otherwise messy process.
Soon, the idea of citizens indirectly selecting the president soon bloomed into the formation of the initial College of Electors. Since then there has been more than 8 cases of faithless votes being cast Peirce, 23. For with the Electoral College, the people are not in charge but rather the system is — the. Nor did they assume that there would be such a dramatic shift in our nation with the creation of two very distinct political parties, men and women holding seats in Congress and in the Supreme Court, or that an African-American would be serving two terms as president. The key word here is republic and not democracy. Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again. Combine this with the fact that smaller states receive more electoral votes per person than larger states, and it becomes possible to win the presidency by winning just 21.
In addition, candidates typically spend a lot more time in swing states and often pass through safe states. Many people feel that the electoral college is unfair because it seems that even if we vote it only comes down to the electoral college to see if they won presidency or re-election. Rather than it coming directly from the people, we have politicians supporting politicians which is not always the safest or trustworthy method of. Top 10 Reasons It's Time to Abolish the Electoral College. Most of the campaign dollars and attention would go to such areas, while other areas would simply be ignored. This is not just a problem for one sport; athletes from many different sports are speaking out.
Sometimes that disparity can act as a caution to the elected president, but where the House and Senate are in the hands of the elected president's party that caution is less likely to operate. First and foremost, there are several arguments to put forward. If you were to break down the number of people per electoral vote, there are way more people per elector, if you will, in Texas than in Wyoming. Subsequently, they knew that the British Government would not give up the control over the rich and fertile colonies in the new continent and hence decided to build strong alliances with each other not only to defend themselves from England, but also from Mexico, France and other future invasions. This will likely create an unstable political system composed of a multitude of political parties which will result in more radical changes in policies from one administration to the next. In cases where three candidates are in a close race, it is possible that the vote could split in such a way that no candidate achieves the required majority of the electoral votes.
Primarily, the publics opinion on the electoral college and how it is the actual determining factor in who is chosen for presidency. This is part of the Issues for Trump and America. But that's all beside the point anyway. Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been using for thousands of years. I served on the Electoral College in 2012 as an elector for President Obama and wrote an opinion piece at that time, for this same newspaper, arguing against the unfairness of this antiquated institution.
Keep your eye on 2020. For instance, California's population the largest is approximately 70 times that of Wyoming's the smallest. It is prescribed by the Constitution, and it can be eliminated only with a Constitutional Amendment. Why should political candidates dedicate more of their time campaigning to citizens in some locations versus other areas? Another argument in favor of the Electoral College casts the issue in terms of federalism and state sovereignty. The other 82 electoral votes were changed on the personal initiative of the elector. Every four years in November over 90 million Americans vote for the presidential candidates, then in the middle of December the president and vice president of the United States are actually elected by the votes of only 538 citizens.
This to me is very outrageous because of how our forefathers from the past had fought for our right to vote, it is being put to waste since it only goes by the Electoral College and not our votes. Why the Electoral College Should Be Abolished and Replaced With the Direct Election Voting System 11 — 24 — 2004 Ever since its creation at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Electoral College has been the most widely debated aspect in the Constitution. Despite other candidates in the running, the vote largely came down to these two individuals. Of course, changing the Constitution to a popular vote system would be tricky, since we'd have to pass an amendment unlikely in the current political atmosphere. Then, on November 11 th, voters elect their electors when they cast their ballots for U. According to the Constitution, electors per state are equal to the number of seats each state holds in the Congress, which include the Senate and the House of Representative delegations. College athletes should be paid to play for many reasons.
Finally, because most states apportion their electors with a winner-take-all rule, states that are more likely to vote for one candidate or another get ignored in the run-up to the election. Each state receives a number of electoral college votes number of state congress members and this is amended every 10 years to reflect changes in state populations. In just a few days, voters will be heading to the polls to cast their ballots for president and have been for the last few weeks. Many students find it the best way to earn money and leave the education behind. Every state has electoral votes that are equal to their representation in Congress, which is based on population. Lazaro Cardenas is a graduate of Rutgers School of Law.