Many countries today have laws that prohibit smoking in public places because it affects non smokers as well. The strain of smoking effects on the body often causes years of suffering. Second, smoking is also very harmful to other people. More people die each year from life itself, not to mention heart disease, cancer of all types, road deaths etc. If tobacco users are not providing that revenue, the rest of us will have to cough up the bucks! Honestly its just not your choice.
Smoking to use as a hunger suppressant is a very unhealthy way of losing wheight. Many people feel it is their right to smoke wherever they please, and you should just get over it; but as ieltsbuddy. That is a lot of people with good jobs! Also, I looked up that the smoke from smokers produces 0. There is no dangerous-free level of vulnerability. What happened to free choice? It should be banned because the percentage of non-smokers is higher than active smokers so non-smokers have right to clean air and also second hand smoke is more dangerous than actually smoking as well. If the government banned tobacco, people would find any necessary means in buying, selling, and using tobacco products despite the ban.
Smoking ban policies do not have enough teeth since repercussions are not harsh enough. Could that be because they like the taste so much they're ready to risk death? This fact alone should be cause enough to ban smoking. By all means educate, even regulate within reason, but stop there. With banning smoking in public places, there will be lesser cigarette butts and lesser toxic garbage that can be stuck in water systems. Cigarette butts, which are mostly non-biodegradable, can be harmful to the environment since they can clog water systems and leach dangerous chemicals into the ground and water table. Banning smoking in public areas means limiting. The purpose in prohibiting smoking isn't for the benefit of the smoker.
I think I smoke because I have a habit - not that I necessarily am craving for nicotine. Let people vote with their feet. Smokers would probably argue that they have every right and all the freedom to smoke to their heart's content. Drunks being victimised for a problem they clearly need help with? So I say that cigarettes should be illegal. Does it make sense for our local governments to begin banning smoking tobacco and begin to permit marijuana possession? Doctors too need educating as the giving of nicotine replacements has got to be the worst thing you can do! My advice to kids- dont even start. Aren't firearms more dangerous than cigarettes? This is reminds me of the war on drugs.
The biggest killers are lung cancer, other smoking related cancers, and heart disease. Cigarettes should be illegal because they the effects of smoking are dangerous. My problem is with all the hundreds of thousands of kids that get diagnosed with lung cancer per year due to second hand smoke. The only people that concern themselves with other peoples smoking are either those that stand to make a buck from sales of snake oil or mindless automatons that believe what they are told. People move swiftly from disapproval of another's attitudes, pastimes and activities, to proclaiming that anything that offends them should be banned. Not the smoking of them.
Smoking kills people and it kills people who are inocent too. If this is the case then legislation is necessary to prevent them being a public nuisance. Michael, a health expert graduate form university of California, there are 50 million people smoke in United States now. Nothing is going to replace cigarettes, if cigs are banned nobody is going to call anything legal that they come out with ' the new cigarettes'. Secondhand smoke, medical costs, health problems, and even death that stems from public smoking is just the beginning of why public smoking should be banned completely.
The destructive impacts of smoking dependably stay in place rather it can be taken as a prescription of unwinding. For instance, in many countries it is allowed to drink alcohol in public places. I have friends who smoke tobacco, saying they want to quit. Electronic vaporizing cigarettes do not produce second hand smoke and are hugely unpopular but won't be for long. The places they do allow smoking might lose a bit of money, but it will also help with the health problems that occur. I mean come on, the only thing you are doing to yourself is killing yourself slowly.
What did your parents teach you??? If smoking is so bad for me, can I take the government to court for attempted murder? Writing an essay about it is a good idea because it will serve as a warning to smokers to quit this bad habit and to non-smokers as well to never try it. Society doesn't benefit from a black market. The fundamentalism underlining such statements is really frightening and the anti-tobacco lobby is becoming more and more hysterical. Smoking leads to several of the most dangerous disease. First, smoking causes numerous health problems to the smoker. Zar or his dad Major Dan.