In a new report, the nation's leading group of pediatricians reaffirms its stance against random drug testing in schools. This problematizes the nature of 'random' testing, which by definition means forcing drug tests on individuals on whom there is no reasonable suspicion of drug use. I believe 100% in educating youth about the dangers of drugs. However, one must take a more nuanced stand on drug testing in schools based on its real pros and cons. The lack of trust implicit on testing must not be underestimated.
In addition to obviously false findings, there can be misleading test results in some cases and at times the findings may be inconclusive. Parents and children must receive accurate and detailed information on the school policy; parents must give consent for younger children, with older children giving their own consent if they understand the full implications. Most teens do not use drugs, but for those who do, it can lead to a wide range of adverse effects on the brain, the body, behavior and health. For instance, the has a directory of state School Boards that you can check online. This material is for illustrative purposes only and is not a contract. He thinks that if school officials feel they have a drug problem, it would be wise to look at the overall climate. The availability of specimen dilution products in internet souks and merchants today has also caused teenagers less apprehensive about drug testing.
The American Academy of Pediatrics is an organization of 62,000 primary care pediatricians, pediatric medical subspecialists and pediatric surgical specialists dedicated to the health, safety and well-being of infants, children, adolescents and young adults. The different methods provide different information, with some, such as hair tests, able to test for drugs used within the past 12 weeks or longer depending on the length of the hair sample 7—100+ days. As they are not actively harming others, these students should be subject only to the same standards as individuals in other areas of society: to only have their privacy violated by drugs tests if their behaviour actively brings them under suspicion. Substance abuse is one huge problem that the world is facing. If kids are never tested for drug or substance abuse and they keep consuming their preferred drug, then nothing can stop them from becoming addicts. Codeine can be detected and interpreted as traces of heroin.
The districts volunteered to be in the program and were spread across seven states. This is more expensive than urine and saliva testing. On a broader note, everyone will agree that drug abuse or even the first time consumption of drugs by any child or student should be prevented at all costs and any measure that can avert the same will be worthwhile. The National Center for Education Evaluation reports that students involved in extracurricular activities in schools that conducted drug testing had less substance use than comparable students from schools without drug testing. Yet the process of student random drug testing on students can be costly and highly controversial, involving a number of complex legal issues and constitutional challenges.
Meet , like who had the courage to defend the Constitution by taking a stand against school practices they believed to be wrong. Ultimately, proponents of drug testing in schools say their goal is to address addiction, identify those using or selling, and offer treatment. Testing saliva the method used in the Kent school has the advantages of acceptability, and little chance of adulteration as it is obtained under direct observation. Still, McClure said, the focus will be on the positives drug testing can provide and not on how much it would potentially cost. Neglecting Other Activities: They are spending less time on activities that used to be important to them hanging out with family and friends, exercising or going to the gym, pursuing hobbies or other interests because of the use of drugs. Current measures to tackle drugs at the source i. When parents give more attention to their children, the children are less likely to commit themselves to unlawful activities.
Testing usually involves a urine test that looks for drugs like , cocaine and amphetamines. Drug testing was responsible for a significant reduction in cigarette smoking among 8th grade students 13-year-olds from 35. With adults, an Independent Inquiry into Drug Testing at Work cautioned against introducing random drug testing in the workplace, concluding that it was inappropriate to drug test as a means of policing private behaviour of employees or improving productivity, except perhaps in safety-critical industries. Identifying kids who use drugs and entering them into treatment programs should be a top priority, but there is little evidence that random drug testing helps accomplish this, said Dr. Understanding Addiction In order to look at the pros and cons of drug testing in schools, we must first consider beliefs about the nature of addiction.
Students who do not use illegal drugs do have something to fear - the violation of privacy and loss of dignity caused by random drug tests. While it would have a very good chance of rooting out those teachers that were abusing drugs, just how many of them would there be? The major concern now is how students as young as 12 years old could already be hooked with these illicit substances. If schools are serious about keeping their students from abusing drugs, then they should listen to the experts — to the , the , and the — who all say that one of the best ways to keep kids off drugs is to get them involved in school and extra-curricular activities. Is it time that the students start understanding the true nature of their personal liberties and do some of these things in school? This process may be harmful for the child, leading him or her to be labeled as a user. Legally, random drug testing can target only kids going out for sports or other extracurricular activities. Even using the cheapest screening test the whole procedure can be costly for schools, especially as frequent testing increases a potential deterrent effect of testing. In order to prevent tampering, no one else is allowed into the restroom at the time of testing.
The claims are that this is for the safety of both the students being tested and the students that attend the same school. For parents, teachers and administrators who deal with students each day, the thought of a drug-free middle school or high school seems idyllic. Such timely rehabilitation will be more effective because the kids would not be as helplessly addicted as grownups with years of substance abuse and it will help prevent serious health problems in the future. The biological detection involves a screening test followed by a confirmatory test if positive. Some employers may opt to refer anyone testing positive to a drug treatment program so that employee has a chance to become productive again. Under the community connection model, addiction is viewed primarily as a problem of lost connections to community rather than a sin, a disease, or a societal issue. Earlier in his educational career, he was coaching basketball at a high school in Indiana.
These simple tactics make your group more legitimate and stable. When misunderstandings about the testing process are clarified, drug testing has been proven a deterrent to illegal drug use and a way for workplaces and schools to be proactive in substance abuse prevention. I don't have any problem with it, as long as they aren't suspending the kids from school for the results. After all the recent drug testing conducted for steroid use in Texas proved that a very small percentage of students actually abused steroids, meaning that many of those who were being tested had no reason to be tested. Its accuracy is questionable because for some reason the surface contamination is possible and may cause a false reading. And what would happen if your child was tested for drug use —? The disease model also advocates for complete abstinence as a means of getting relief from this incurable, deadly affliction.